12/3/2023 0 Comments Kafka franz metamorphosisLike Camus' Sisyphus, who is doomed to hauling a rock uphill only to watch it roll down the other side, they find themselves faced with the fate of trying to wring a measure of dignity for themselves in an absurd world. The guilt of existentialist heroes, as of Kafka's, lies in their failure to choose and to commit themselves in the face of too many possibilities - none of which appears more legitimate or worthwhile than any other one. As a result, he comes to regard his total freedom of choice as a curse. He alone must determine what constitutes a moral action although he can never foresee the consequences of his actions. Deprived of all metaphysical guidelines, a man is nevertheless obligated to act morally in a world where death renders everything meaningless. Kafka certainly remained fascinated and overwhelmed by the major theme of all varieties of existentialist thinking, namely the difficulty of responsible commitment in the face of an absurd universe. These various people have rather little in common concerning their religious, philosophical, or political views, but they nevertheless share certain characteristic tenets present in Kafka. Dostoevsky, Nietzsche, and Kierkegaard all have a certain existentialist dimension in their writings, as do Camus, Sartre, Jaspers and Heidegger, with whose works the term existentialism has been more or less equated since World War H. Kafka's relationship with existentialism is much more complex, mainly because the label "existentialist" by itself is rather meaningless. In terms of content, Kafka was highly skeptical and even inimical toward the expressionist demand for the "new man." This moralistic-didactic sledgehammer method repulsed him. While Kafka was perhaps not the great craftsman in the sense that Flaubert was, he admired this faculty in others. To me, it merely proves the painter's inner chaos." What he rejected in expressionism is the overstatement of feeling and the seeming lack of craftsmanship. However, if we consider what he thought of some of the leading expressionists of his day, he certainly cannot be associated with the movement: he repeatedly confessed that the works of the expressionists made him sad of a series of illustrations by Kokoschka, one of the most distinguished representatives of the movement, Kafka said: "I don't understand. Of course, Kafka does have certain characteristics in common with expressionists, such as his criticism of the blindly scientific-technological world-view, for instance. To reduce Kafka's symbols to their "real" meanings and to pigeonhole his world-view as some "ism" or other is to obscure his writing with just the kind of meaningless experience from which he liberated himself through his art.Įxpressionism is one of the literary movements frequently mentioned in connection with Kafka, possibly because its vogue in literature coincided with Kafka's mature writing, between 1912 and his death in 1924. Only the events themselves can reveal the basic absurdity of things. Kafka's world is essentially chaotic, and this is why it is impossible to derive a specific philosophical or religious code from it - even one acknowledging chaos and paradox as does much existential thought. Yet the overriding response one has is one of tragedy rather than irony as one watches Kafka's heroes trying to piece together the debris of their universe. Such a universe about which nothing can be said that cannot at the same time - and just as plausibly - be contradicted has a certain ironic quality about it - ironic in the sense that each possible viewpoint becomes relativized. Thus a total view must inevitably remain inaccessible to him. This, in turn, is the result of Kafka's view - which he shares with many twentieth-century writers - that his own self is a parcel of perennially interacting forces lacking a stable core if he should attain an approximation of objectivity, this can come about only by describing the world in symbolic language and from a number of different vantage points. The reason for this is that the stories offer a wide variety of possible meanings without confirming any particular one of them. If their endings, or lack of endings, seem to make sense at all, they will not do so immediately and not in unequivocal language. Kafka's stories suggest meanings which are accessible only after several readings.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |